gonzales

yeah, I already admitted it was me, and personally I don't see anything wrong with speeding - it's riding too fast for the conditions that's dangerous. Anyway, I might post on the police forum and see what they have to say for themselves.

They were both from the same constabulary but one was a fixed camera and the other a mobile unit. Trouble is, I'm not sure how fast I was going (could've been tripple figures). I slammed the breaks on when I saw the van and it was two lanes with lots of other traffic so they might not have had an accurate fix on my bike. Plus, I would've been within the limit by the time I went past them (which is when they would have got to see my plate). And to say I was going in excess of 70mph is not necessarily a fine-able offense until you hit something like 79mph. On one hand, I could ask them and if they say they don't know the exact speed, then I might be able to get away with it. but on the other hand, they might take a closer look and say, "actually it was over 100mph and we're going to ban you"

Hi all, I got a NIP through the post stating "motor vehicle exceed 70 mph on a dual carriageway" - but doesn't mention how fast I was going. I've been caught in the past and on my previous ticket it stated the actual speed I was going. It was a manned mobile unit and I'm just wondering if they clocked I was speeding face on but didn't get my number plate till I'd gone past. Is it possible they don't have solid evidence of what speed I was actually going and are just bluffing to see if I'll admit to it and pay the fine? Anyone else had a similar experience? I'm wondering if it's worth asking them for their evidence or if I'd be opening a can of worms with that request.