Would it make bike companies actually sell decent kit in the first place.
Not read any bike tests for years, but having owned several bikes that were praised for their instant response or forgiving handling.
What they mean that is the fi is so sudden it's scary or the suspension is so bad you have to ride slowly.
As an example, the gen 2 Fazer 1000 fuelling was dreadful, so bad in fact that at the 2007 bike product awards the dynojet rep actually thanked Lyn Jarvis for making so much money for them!
Fast forward 20 years, and Yamaha are still making fi bikes that don't fuel properly!
I understand the need to pass emissions/noise tests messes with the fuelling, but why put a fuelling map so sharp that hitting a bump results in uncontrollable acceleration......on a retro bike.
Or is it simply that you criticize a bike and they pull the advertising!