Boothy

He should get nob of the year, let alone day.

 

Yeh your not wrong, for what comes out his mouth and his boxing skills.. Heavyweight division is crap now.

 

Deontay Wilder... Joseph Parker... Anthony Joshua.

The Joshua v Whyte fight the other night wasn't exactly boring. Tyson Fury is just a nob.

Called tonight over two years ago

Anybody going to be watching the Joshua v Parker fight then? Who do we think is going to win?

Tyson Fury.

 

He should get nob of the year, let alone day.

 

Yeh your not wrong, for what comes out his mouth and his boxing skills.. Heavyweight division is crap now.

Deontay Wilder... Joseph Parker... Anthony Joshua.

The Joshua v Whyte fight the other night wasn't exactly boring. Tyson Fury is just a nob.

Happy Birthday Stu

Just come across this....

Its official now anyway, what does everybody think about it. Not really sure what happened with Honda TT Legends but I would bet he is on far less money than he would have been there!

They're all proxy's it doesn't make a difference, its just Hola is a plugin for your browser so you just click on/off so its pretty easy.

Most people just look at the amount of ram, but the speed of it is just as important. I've got 8 and it says its using 7.## most of the time on Battlefield 3 so I'm not sure where you got that from?

 

Have you got a memory leak? just checked and it's 750Mb on medium, 860MB on ultra. Have 4GB system RAM 1033Mhz and 2GB Video RAM DDR5.

1080p 40"

Just went to check! I have 16gb not 8gb (don't remember doing that ) and BF4 is using 7.4gb. Quick google and its fairly normal.

Of course it makes a difference... the peak transfer rate for DDR3 800 is 6400mb/s... the peak transfer rate for DDR3 1600 is 12800mb/s. If the ram you're running in a system that is of a comparable standard to your memory then upgrading that won't really make a difference, however if you put your memory in a higher power rig (not than you can because they're all DDR3) then it would all be bottlenecked by the memory. And the reason most people go for higher speed memory than is really needed is for more overclocking headroom, I think my 2133 rated sticks are only currently running at 1600. And of course tightening to speed up the clock cycles between RAM and CPU will make a difference. And I'm not 100% on this but isn't most haswell memory 1.5v so it doesn't really make a difference to the power consumption?!

As to why the recommended system settings was saying you need a AMD 6 core cpu... probably because AMD don't make any good CPU's

Back on topic, yes it should playable. Would you be getting anywhere near the potential of the game? No.

Not sure how many of you use Netflix on a computer, but if you install a google chrome plugin called 'Hola' you can get all of the content from the American netflix.

https://hola.org

If the developers took a bit more time to optimise their code, you wouldn't need such high spec machines

Most major game developers already have teams working on optimisation, they could spend many more hours doing it and have to charge more for the game but it would make very little difference for most consumers.

I don't understand the 8gb RAM thing. doesn't mention the speed of the RAM and bf3 doesn't use more than 2gb RAM when playing. 3gb RAM on the graphics is just mad.

Most people just look at the amount of ram, but the speed of it is just as important. I've got 8 and it says its using 7.## most of the time on Battlefield 3 so I'm not sure where you got that from?

I wouldn't even try and play battlefield 4 on it, at best you'll be able to play it on Low settings and it won't really be an enjoyable experience (unless you're used to console graphics, in which case go ahead)

I've heard they've sorted out the optimisation problems since the Beta but I tried to play it with a GTX 680 / i7 4770k / 8GB DDR3 2133 and it was having a f**king spaz.

Respond to a post by Boothy without remembering him drinking Bex's beer!

This is the first time I've hear about this... what?

Listening to Boothy while attending a rally.

Oh.

Fankooooo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY9mrKR5SkA

Oh and...

http://vimeo.com/32756097

Oh and ffs forget Rossi he's old news and wouldn't get near them.

See you at the end of next season...

Mr Stoner has been testing the new Honda. I don't really like him but Having Lorenzo, Marquez, Stoner and Rossi on the same grid would be fun...

boothy, stop interrupting the adult's conversations.

 

Sorry, I know this thread really hits home as your girlfriend is 10 years younger and your bit on the side is 16 years younger

 

Bit on the side?

You not heard about him and Devans?

boothy, stop interrupting the adult's conversations.

Sorry, I know this thread really hits home as your girlfriend is 10 years younger and your bit on the side is 16 years younger

Tempted not to make any changes.

22 she is 16 years younger than me, but kinda getting past that now as we are so great together

Well played

age is just a number on a certificate somewhere, your attitude is more of a guidance.

That's what Jimmy Savile would have said.

Basically... Lowes (accidentally) crashed into the back of Byrne at about 120MPH which caused Byrne to crash out. Lowes won the race then got excluded.

Interesting weekend. Think just about everybody had Byrne and Lowes... both of who scored no points in Race 2.