Jump to content

SometimesSansEngine

Registered users
  • Posts

    1,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SometimesSansEngine

  1. It sounds like he is only taking the A1 licence. He would have been totally able to take the 'full' A licence - did he give a reason? Was it personal choice, a misunderstanding or a recommendation?

  2. Just some data...

     

    "Road collision data produced by MAST shows that there were 7663 collisions recorded involving young people (aged 16-24) where the police attended in 2012. 4175 of these collisions involved 16-19 year olds showing that this group of teenagers is 50% more likely to have a collision than the 20-24 year olds.... 88% of collisions involved males.... While the incidence of road collisions by gender reflects the gender profile of all CBT learners, the MAST data reveals that when males have collisions, they are more likely to be severe, resulting in death or serious injury, than when females have collisions (24% compared to 13%)"

     

    "Learners and trainers disagree about learners’ level of understanding of riding mopeds and motorcycles before CBT, with over half of learners claiming they had a high or fair level of understanding but less than a quarter of trainers thinking their learners had this level of understanding. In the learners’ survey, 16-18 year olds claimed almost the same level of understanding as older learners. Women are less likely to claim they had a high level of understanding. 43% of learners had no riding experience before taking their most recent CBT. Over four in ten claimed to have read the Highway Code to prepare for CBT. Over four in ten talked to friends or relatives who had taken CBT. More 16-18 year olds took these two actions than learners in general."

     

    "15% are not receiving the legal minimum 2 hours on the road"

     

    I haven't read the whole thing but will when I get a chance. There is some info on what instructors would like to change, eg they're split on making an annual refresher mandatory but also feel it would be good to just take returners out on a road ride to check competence.

     

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380799/cbt-learners-trainers-report.pdf

     

    • Like 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, onesea said:

    Possible thread derailment coming...

     

    What should be in the CBT?
     

    My thoughts:

    ALL ROAD USERS - except pedestrians.

    Including horse riders and electric buggy’s/ scooters.

     

    Enhanced Hazard/ danger awareness theory,

    Enhanced Highwaycode knowledge theory,

     

    Pass/ fail can be done before and have option of on day however still sitting exam and need to pass before going on road.

     

    Actual bike test.

    At the end there should be a videos test, U turn, emergency stop, basically mod 1&2 but feet down allowed and a short road ride. Some, Competence required not a high standard.

    Why videos?  Then dodgy instructors would have to be more careful.

     

     

     

     

    I'd like to see you need to do your theory test before doing your CBT.

     

    If you do your CBT on an automatic, you're only entitled to ride an automatic.

     

    Make the CBT at least two days so more road riding can be incorporated.

     

    Agree with the mod 1 style exercises, and as I think the mod 1 is too black and white as is (I'd allow people to have a second go at some of the exercises if their general performance is sound) agreed on the principle that it doesn't have to be perfect first time.

     

    Separately I'd want to give those who take their A1 licence more incentive to do so. At the moment if you're 17 and take your CBT, there is pretty much zero motivation to do your A1, which means you miss out on additional training at such a critical age. Why do it just so you can ride the same bike, when in two years if you want to ride a bigger bike you have to do it all again (CBT included anyway) at additional cost?

     

    I'd also be interested in a review amongst instructors to see if as an industry they feel the assessment of whether someone gets a certificate should be independent. I know plenty of them have some horror stories. I've said before that I think motorcycle licencing is a huge turn off for new riders (see here), it's so convoluted and confusing... but at CBT level I do wonder if there should be more oversight

  4. I did my CBT in my 30s. It left me utterly petrified that that's all young kids who may have never really used the roads before get in terms of training.

     

    In fact, when my 16 year old niece expressed an interest in taking her CBT I got all protective and said if she did I'd want to go on a few rides with her first. She won't of course, deep down I know that, but I had to offer.

  5. 51 minutes ago, Fish said:

    I get the odd email offering dates, but as soon as you open it all the dates are already booked out.

     

    Plus not sure I'd want to do it on L's

     

    Fish

     

    I know Avon and Somerset have always insisted on a full licence. Which I've always thought as a shame/missed opportunity, as surely it's people who may have only done a CBT who would greatly benefit?

     

    If they were worried about the differences in acceleration between different types of bike they could offer l-plate only days 

  6. The l-plater who nearly reshaped the back of my bike for me because he hadn't realised traffic was slowing because of a car waiting to turn. 

     

    Luckily as I'd been looking in my mirrors at them as I slowed I was able to dink to the left.....

  7. Seems like you're just down the road from me @jayinatree, if not next door. Judging by what you say on your selling thread.

     

    Luckily the 125 that nearly went up my backside today wasn't a Honda so at least I know that wasn't you 😂

  8. 1 minute ago, jedibiker said:

    @Cpt_TactKicking of mirrors due to someone doing something many do is a sign someone has an attitude issue.

     

    Worth remembering that people who are arses will likely be an arse whatever form of transport they're on at that moment in time... Four wheels, two wheels, engine, no engine.

    • Like 4
  9. 1 hour ago, Cpt_Tact said:

    I Iad one mate who was dangerous on a bike and when I mentioned doing IAM or similar as a refresher he took it as a personal attack as he had been riding for 7 years and never had an accident, so in his eyes there was nothing wrong with hugging the apex round a right hand bend!  

     

    As you probably know many taster sessions subtly cover "the attitude test". I know mine did. At the end the person who had gone out with me sat me down with a tea and asked what my motivations for doing an advanced course etc were.

     

    I had a work colleague walk up to me whilst I was doing my IAM and say "so what would an advanced course teach me that I don't already know" before listing off the things he was just fine with, in his opinion. I politely said it didn't sound like it was for him.

  10. Depending on how long you've been off, my old boss had a long long layoff from riding, and even though he had ridden "bigger" bikes in his youth he said the "smaller" bike he returned to had a lot more performance and took a bit of getting used to.

     

    If you're returning I think a back to biking course would be a small investment in the grand scheme of things. Added bonus, you could use a school bike for that wobbly phase that you're getting back into it.

    • Like 1
  11. I was told long ago 

    1. High mileage on most bikes (assuming its been looked after) is much less of a problem than cars. In fact I was told at the mileages you're quoting they're barely broken in. I was also told that regular riding (with regular maintenance) causing a higher mileage can be better than a low mileage bike that barely went anywhere for a few years and was laid up
    2. If you buy a Japanese 125 it should hold its value well

    I'm not mechanically minded nor experienced enough to vouch too much for (1), but (2) was true when both my wife and I bought and sold our 125s.

    • Like 1
  12. 7 hours ago, James in Brum said:

    Yes, but there are some of the flip ups that are safe/okay to use with the flip ups up as opposed to most which are not. There is a name for this and it has been mentioned here before. 

     

    7 hours ago, fullscreenaging said:

    Dual-homologation

     

    As @fullscreenaging said, if unsure on a specific helmet look for the P/J on the inner label (J is open faced, P is closed face, having both means it's designed and tested for both uses)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Please Sign In or Sign Up