Jump to content

FIFA and the Poppy


nman1
 Share

Recommended Posts

What's religious, political or commercial about wearing a poppy?? It's like wearing three lions is it not - for pride surely - more PC nonsense stripping our country of it's heritage, traditions and identity :evil: :evil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing what gets me about the whole thing is. FIFA won't even let the players wear a black armband with a poppy on. But if joe bloggs dies every team have black armbands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats more disrespectful to me is the very fact that the subject is being discussed. Who the hell would take offence at the wearing of a poppy and who the hell would THINK anyone would.


Some people just don`t know how to justify their own feckin jobs. Tossers, sorry about language but this crap makes my blood boil :twisted: :twisted:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, I don't see why the whole issue should be getting dragged into sport anyway.

It has nothing to do with it.

Sport should be kept for exactly that, things to do with the sport.

Same with minutes silences etc as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not about poppies - it's about marketing, logos and FIFAs control over shirt sponsorship.


They are trying to ensure that they retain the power to control what appears on international kits which, for right or wrong, is the authority they have.


Personally I'd have thought that, knowing how corrupt the entire organisation is, someone could have slipped them a tenner and been done with it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They`re playing Spain so why not really piss em off and put posters up of this fine lady with the date below, although to be honest I doubt it is them that`s complaining as they are sent poppies to sell from the RBL


1588 :up:

elizabeth1_lg.jpg.2eb9e8fc81c23d0804a4b6668cbad040.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also something strangely ironic about the head of the British government moaning about this as well, considering if the same government took care of the people who sign up to the armed forces, then the charity wouldn't even be needed.


And have England had poppies on their shirts in any previous years ?

Have they even tried ? If not, why not ? And why just this year ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understand the point your making Ratser but my point is WHY the feck this issue was brought up in the first place.


Who will it offend. ???

Why will it offend if it does ???

What harm will it do ????


If anyone can personally answer "none" and "pass" to these questions then what the hell is it worth the hasttle for. Like I say, some bloody jobsworth trying to be difficult and justify his/her insignificant existance through elevating their profile, on what they know will be a highly publisised topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And have England had poppies on their shirts in any previous years ?

Have they even tried ? If not, why not ? And why just this year ?

Because this year is the 90th anniversary of the creation of The British Legion in 1921, granted a Royal Charter in 1971 on its 50th anniversary thus becoming The Royal British Legion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understand the point your making Ratser but my point is WHY the feck this issue was brought up in the first place.


Who will it offend. ???

Why will it offend if it does ???

What harm will it do ????


If anyone can personally answer "none" and "pass" to these questions then what the hell is it worth the hasttle for. Like I say, some bloody jobsworth trying to be difficult and justify his/her insignificant existance through elevating their profile, on what they know will be a highly publisised topic.

 

I think it is just UEFA policy mate.

Unless the charity is the main sponsor of a club team (eg Barcelona, Aston Villa once before) then they don't allow additional badging on the shirts, no matter the cause or reason.

My guess is the issue was brought up in the first place as it is the first time England have been due to play an international close to Remembrance Sunday. Either that or this is the first time they have ever applied to have the symbol on their shirts.


Is it really such a big issue to get into a stooshy about though ? It wont disrespect the memory of the service men and women, and it's not as if it's the only time for Remembrance this week, at a friendly football match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And have England had poppies on their shirts in any previous years ?

Have they even tried ? If not, why not ? And why just this year ?

Because this year is the 90th anniversary of the creation of The British Legion in 1921, granted a Royal Charter in 1971 on its 50th anniversary thus becoming The Royal British Legion.

 

I get your point Cruz, and am obviously aware of your loyalty to the RBL.

However did they do this for the 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, etc ?


I am just playing devils advocate here, as it's not really a big deal to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f**ked if I know !

How 'kin old do you think I am ?

:lol: :lol:


Joking aside, it is because of the importance of the 90th. And not something that would be done on a regular basis.

And it makes no difference to me either, I think that it is a shame but that's life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't in a position to precisely judge what Cameron is thinking of our troops but I do agree commercialism at its best...


It's alright to advertise mens balding products, sky, banks etc but the second it involves something non-profitable like remembering our dead from a world war which affected us all then thats just not on.


Is it offensive... No


What I personally find piss funny is they wont let them wear a poppy out of concern they will offend someone. And the decision to not let them has offended a major majority :lol:


Way to go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't in a position to precisely judge what Cameron is thinking of our troops but I do agree commercialism at its best...


It's alright to advertise mens balding products, sky, banks etc but the second it involves something non-profitable like remembering our dead from a world war which affected us all then thats just not on.


Is it offensive... No


What I personally find piss funny is they wont let them wear a poppy out of concern they will offend someone. And the decision to not let them has offended a major majority :lol:


Way to go!

 

No, they are not allowed to advertise on international jerseys mate.


And having checked on my earlier question to Cruz, England did not apply to be allowed poppies on the jerseys for previous 'anniversaries'. (England 1 Sweden 1 2001 - Sat 10th Nov - no poppy or even black arm bands))

Why they even feel the need to have them on the jerseys anyway is the sad part IMO.


Thankfully in Scotland, last year was the last time the clubs were being forced to wear poppies on their shirts.

Not sure how many opted to have them on their shirts this year, I just know my club didn't. Instead they donated £10,000 to the charity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully in Scotland, last year was the last time the clubs were being forced to wear poppies on their shirts.

Not sure how many opted to have them on their shirts this year, I just know my club didn't. Instead they donated £10,000 to the charity.

 

"The Legion never insists that the poppy be worn or insists that others allow it to be worn," said Mr Simpkins. "We are grateful when people wear it as a sign of respect, but the decision must be a free one - after all, the poppy represents sacrifices made in the cause of our freedoms."


I'm pretty sure RBLS would have the same policy.

Saddened a little that your club feel that it can't wear the Poppy. Without wanting to start a heated debate, if this is a sectarian thing then it is being used as a political football. That said Like Chris Simkins says no one can or indeed should be forced to wear the Poppy, I am also sure your clubs generous donation was gratefully received.

The Poppy does tend to be represented as a British thing, but was orginally an American womans idea, which was taken up by a French woman in and then The British Legion in 1921. I felt priviledged to meet WW2 Vet's when I attended the first Royal British Legion Parade in Phoenix Park in Dublin a few years ago and to be allowed to see the many battle honours won by Irish Regiments in both World wars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Welcome to The Motorbike Forum.

    Sign in or register an account to join in.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Please Sign In or Sign Up