To be fair, I think the problem is with probably shared more evenly between the government and the EU. For example, the EU driving directive stipulates testing at least two slow speed manoeuvres, including negotiating a slalom. The UK government said to themselves that they couldn't possibly test that on the open road, and so built a whole series of test centres, each with acres of smooth tarmac, all dedicated to testing according to the EU directive. The Irish government, by contrast, said to themselves that of course everyone must end up doing some kind of slalomy type manoeuvre when they're out on their test and as long they don't fall off, they must have done it pretty well. So the Irish motorcycle test is a single test, all of it is carried out on the road, and all you have to do is show you can control the bike at slow speed. Which is right? Well, given no other information, it would be hard to see how on earth the Irish government's test meets the EU driving directive. But it sure does make a lot more sense out of it than the UK government's approach. But the root of the problem lies with the EU, who preside over a system where it's possible to come with up with an interpretation of the directive that is so wide of the mark that was written down, and yet which is still considered to meet its standards.