was bored yesterday at work.. very bored. i worked the numbers for each of my current and planned rider combinations. i worked out the average points scored per rider/team per race, the cost of each of those points compared to the riders cost etc. i now know which team combinations offer the better point:cost ratio. who would of thought that it would be better value for money to have jenny tinmouth partnering tommy hill rather than hill and brookes in the same team makes weighting each round easier, based on the amount of race meets for each class. i have even projected what each combination of riders would be likely to score for the rest of the season if they continued having the same luck/results. based on the math, i have planned exactly what changes to make over the remaining races. what could possibly go wrong. apart from rain/illness/crashes/injuries/quitting/bautista etc just a shame that i didnt do it at round 2 as i doubt a final score of 1452 for me and 1601 for rach will be enough..... not when others have blind luck on their side. eh, techno?