Confused now, if prisons are such crap places to be why are they so overcrowded? The thought of going to prison should act as a deterrent, I don't always believe in the old adage "an eye for an eye", but I would let the people he threw acid over, who will have to live with not just the psychological and emotional scars for the rest of their lives, but also the physical ones, decide on what his punishment should be, now that would be justice. One of the reasons they are so crap is because they are so over crowded. They are overcrowded because the public and government demands more poeple are locked up, but refuse to fund the necessary spending. My solution for a crime such as acid attacks, is that since the victim has to live with the scars for life, the punishment should be for life. That does not mean a life behind bars. It can mean a life time of doing community service, or wearing tag or an annual compensation payment. I would have life time fines, meaning a punishment could be a fine of £500, which has to be paid every year for the rest of a persons life. There are lots of options for very effective punishments that could keep peopel out of prison, whilst making sure they and others are deterred from committing crime. I would do that for lots of crimes. Many motoring offences should attract life time bans, such as fleeing the police, a third drink driving offence, a third driving whilst disqualified. I think that fraudsters who rip people off should face a possible life of having any income they get is reduced till ALL the money is paid back.