Jump to content

James in Brum

Registered users
  • Posts

    1,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by James in Brum

  1. I would Rob but I have my zzr600 and it is brilliant. 
    pro’s of bigger bikes are that they have more power and are capable of more particularly in carrying stuff or pillion and still having ooomph. 
    smaller bikes may have lower insurance. 
    mot seems this crowd don’t identify many pros or cons other than that?

  2. Hi gang,

    I was musing this morning on my commute about how much more pleasant it is on my 600 compared to similar commutes on my 125. That said I’m not convinced that, on any part of my commute except the motorway/NSL roads, I need bigger and I notice a difference in fuel, 50mpg vs 100mpg.

    I feel more secure and safe in all weathers on the 600, it is less easy (though not difficult) to filter. 
     

    Then I saw an article about a 250 and a 370 CC (or something like that) and it go me wondering. 
    what are the pay offs and losses as you increase in engine size?

  3. Hopefully buying a house. I want to feel like I have a handle on being lead homeopathist, I was new in Feb and then this virus hit (not sure if you heard about it) that hit us in the nhs a bit hard and has definite affected my taking charge of the other homeopathists. 
    I want to grow more food for us at the allotment and focus a bit more on it. With luck I will start a masters. 
     

    • Like 1
  4. Indeed but we can recognise it, look for it, think about how it is affecting our relationship With the evidence. In the Case of the Death Penalty it has been shown through evidence not work as a deterrent, the system leading to it cannot be set to preclude any wrong deaths. Logically people have to acknowledge that to be in about of the death penalty you have to accept the likelihood that some innocent person or persons will be killed also. If your emotional relationship with idea prevents you from accepting that you are not being logical. Similarly if some people are happy to accept that there would be some innocents killed and that is worth while collator damage then at least it is honest.

    • Like 1
  5. Does that mean you are not arguing for the death penalty? You would happily kill the person from your trial if given free from consequence opportunity but that you are not looking to bring back the death penalty?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Please Sign In or Sign Up