I can I use my bike to go to doctors..

[Gerontious]

26 minutes ago, Slowlycatchymonkey said:

But it’s ok to ride with a non contagious bacterial infection?  

It has nothing to say about that.

[TimR]

On 26/11/2020 at 09:02, onesea said:

New clause added to my policy...

Does this mean I cannot go to work on my bike if it includes doing any of these?

 

Part c is the major part you have to worry about

If  there is a National Lockdown as we had March onwards 

And your journey was not necessary and you have a moment they could cite this because of lockdown restrictions to curb/minimise the impact .

 

Edited November 27, 2020 by TimR

[bonio]

2 hours ago, Slowlycatchymonkey said:

But it’s ok to ride with a non contagious bacterial infection?  

Like.... Lyme disease? :-S

[Slowlycatchymonkey]

2 minutes ago, bonio said:

Like.... Lyme disease? :-S

Hehehe Watching someone riding with tetanus might be more entertaining

[bonio]

@TimR The clause doesn't mention lockdown, so shouldn't be used in the way you suggest.

Edited November 28, 2020 by bonio
Typo

[onesea]

10 hours ago, bonio said:

Did you buy personal accident cover as an extra when you took out the policy? Or was it thrown in as part of the package you bought?

Think I paid extra..

Probably was not valid today riding home with a home Corona test in my jacket pocket  

[TimR]

9 hours ago, bonio said:

@TimR The clause doesn't mention lockdown, so shouldn't be used in the way you suggest.

To me lockdown was a form of curbing /minimising the impact of a infectious/contagious disease so would that not qualify in their view as :

Clause C AND A

[learningtofly]

13 hours ago, TimR said:

Part c is the major part you have to worry about

If  there is a National Lockdown as we had March onwards 

And your journey was not necessary and you have a moment they could cite this because of lockdown restrictions to curb/minimise the impact .

 

I'm not sure that I'm reading it like that - it sounds more like consequential loss to me (although IANAL).

[Guest Swagman]

55 minutes ago, learningtofly said:

I'm not sure that I'm reading it like that - it sounds more like consequential loss to me (although IANAL).

Let’s face it however we read it they will read it differently.

[Mawsley]

Anal?

Finally a subject on here that I can join in with and share my lifetime of knowledge..

[TimR]

13 minutes ago, Mawsley said:

Anal?

Finally a subject on here that I can join in with and share my lifetime of knowledge..

There's always at least one ar*ehole 

[Slowlycatchymonkey]

10 minutes ago, TimR said:

There's always at least one ar*ehole 

If you have more than one maybe seek medical attention. 

Edited November 28, 2020 by Slowlycatchymonkey

[jedibiker]

id soon get rid of them. Motorcycles are a form of transport. I'm not sure why so many class them as a toy. You are allowed to travel to exercise and for many reasons other than work. But its likely your personal cover is being strict and classing the bike as a danger sport. So id get a different policy. if we all put up with this controlling crap we are screwed. People with cars don't get these letters.

[Mawsley]

[dynax]

If you don't want to be tied to your bike insurance for personal cover, take out a seperate personal injury policy with someone else