DJP Posted Sunday at 13:22 Posted Sunday at 13:22 I fancy a new bike so I've been looking for quotes and it's getting ridiculous. I'm after a super naked – like the GSX1000S, Hornet 1000, MT09 etc and I'm getting quotes around the £1000 mark. Even the sensible option, like the GSX8-S is coming in at about £800. For perspective, over the last few years I've been paying around £130 FC on my Bandit 1250. I'm 55, clean license, full NCB and the bike is garaged. If I can't get insured for sensible money then I can't see much chance for anyone else. 1 4 Quote
Simon Davey Posted Sunday at 13:58 Posted Sunday at 13:58 Wonder if the time of year (new bike time) has anything to do with it? It's not like you're going to a demon machine from something angelic. I'm assuming that Suzy Bandit is quite "feisty".. 1 Quote
Tiggie Posted Sunday at 14:05 Posted Sunday at 14:05 My car insurance was £130 cheaper this year Quote
bud Posted Sunday at 15:59 Posted Sunday at 15:59 That does sound quite expensive. Could it be the age of the bandit compared to new bikes making the difference? Quote
Throttled Posted Sunday at 18:15 Posted Sunday at 18:15 I just got a quote of £180. I am 58, live in a low risk area and it is for a new bike. Quote
RideWithStyles Posted Sunday at 20:24 Posted Sunday at 20:24 (edited) At that age of bike any normal bike for a minor off or claim will pretty much scrap the bike off from their prospective, were as my mechanic would buy it and bring it back to sellable sale, depending on the bikes requirement and price he could get it.. Edited Sunday at 20:24 by RideWithStyles Quote
DJP Posted Sunday at 22:28 Author Posted Sunday at 22:28 (edited) 8 hours ago, Tiggie said: My car insurance was £130 cheaper this year My car insurance isn't much more than £130! And that's the joke of it: Playing with the quotes, even Third Party Only is twice as much on the bikes as I pay fully comp on a large estate car. And I'm afraid that's where it starts to look like a con. There's just no way a 200kg bike is twice the Third Party risk of 1.5 tonne car, with the same driver. So I thought that maybe it's the theft aspect, but the difference between TPO and TPFT is only about £20 so it's not even that. I really am at a loss to explain it. Edited Sunday at 22:29 by DJP Quote
vstromming Posted Monday at 13:21 Posted Monday at 13:21 Your old Bandit and a stream of much, much, much newer and desirable bikes aren't comarable. Apples and oranges. My 1050XT has gone down about 150 from last year. £621, no garage, no security declared, fair few bikes stolen in the area, 34 years old, full licence since 19, no endorsements. Quote
Fish Posted Monday at 19:17 Posted Monday at 19:17 I was talking with a traffic officer who lives not that far from me and with all his years of experience and additional rider qualifications I was shocked to find out he pays a damn sight more than I do. So when they ask about additional training certs it means nothing what so ever! Insurance is just one big rip off! IMHO 3 Quote
S-Westerly Posted Monday at 20:54 Posted Monday at 20:54 Insurance is basically a tax on driving / riding. Chances of getting a decent payout if you ever need one are not good. Can see damn all justification for some of the prices rattling around. Quote
Bender Posted Monday at 21:03 Posted Monday at 21:03 Third party or tpft has historically for about 15yrs been more expensive than fully inclusive because they think either your tight and your a risk or your cutting corners and your a risk. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.