Joe85

All Heil Overload May.

He said in the post presser that he thought he had the fight in the bag and that AJ was done. He's gotta take the rematch, surely?

Fury would be obliterated By Joshua. Like Hatton, his body can't cope with the abuse he deals it - weight gain, drugs, booze etc. Fair comment and each to there own but I think (know) fury is a danger man to anybody if it ever happens I'll do a wager with ya lol I'll have some of that

Fair comment and each to there own but I think (know) fury is a danger man to anybody if it ever happens I'll do a wager with ya lol It does have to be noted, Fury toyed with Wlad in his fight, where AJ very nearly lost. That's either down to the condition of Wlad in each fight or the ability of the opposition. Fury would be very tough for AJ. Different fights, different mind sets. Wlad was the challenger vs AJ, he was always going to be more aggressive. Hats off to him too. Looked 10 years younger.

Fury would be obliterated By Joshua. Like Hatton, his body can't cope with the abuse he deals it - weight gain, drugs, booze etc.

The transit driver going the wrong way down a motorway slip road. Was a bend too, so while im doing 60 to get up to speed i round the corner to see the headlights of a transit coming towards me. Lots of abs and back wheel fishtailing later i passed him on the left. As i get to the motorway i see 3 or 4 more cars going the wrong way down the slip road....all because there was traffic. *****. Turning off the motorway down a slip road the wrong way.

Wouldn't worry. Took me 2 attempts on the car licence and 4 on the bike. 1st one i couldn't find the test centre, 2nd i failed. 3rd i couldn't be arsed to get out of bed and 4th i scraped through.

So long as it is wired correctly, Live, Neutral Earth are in the correct terminals their shouldn't be an issue. His Xbox will only draw what is want's to draw, no more, no less. If it is wired correct then the fault will be in his Xbox. My guess, his Xbox tripped the MCB.

Paid £4-500quid, 3 days training and both tests all in. Thoroughly recommend it.

Dig a deep hole in the garden.

Fair?

He's done a 600cc Tuk Tuk, with BB machines guns mounted.

Excellent

827 people have died as a result of contact with Police since 2004. Not one Officer has been convicted. I don't think he has much to worry about.

I've been dragged into a basement by gun-toting police, who then proceeded to kick the living shit out of me. No, I never felt safer living in a country where the cops were armed - because it simply breeds a situation where more people get arms. There are solutions to dealing with knife-wielding nutters, giving the police munitions is not it. The police suffer, as do all the public services, from a crippling level of paperwork, ridiculous inspection regimes and criminal underfunding. The thoroughness of the training coppers receive in their specialities has ebbed away. Give the police money, give them proper support again (instead of Group IV), give them more numbers, give them comprehensive ongoing self defence training and give them hours instead of meaningless targets - but don't give them bullets. Agreed. It's a no from me. The guy had a death wish. He was going to stab someone whether that Officer had a gun or not. If he had a gun, could he have unholstered and shot him? Did he have a taser? Why didn't he use that? My understanding is he had his taser but chose to apprehend the guy physically(?) No one knows at this point. Arming the Police, however, wont stop attacks like this, or the one on Jo Cox, or the Paris attack, or the Bastille attack, or 7/7. Stopped Jean Charles De Menezes, though.

Bikes got nicked.

Turns out he still is banged up for it. Oops!

If the private property is open to members of the public then the rules of the road apply. To be classed as private property for traffic law it needs to be securely gated so not any Joe Public can drive onto it. That's me told then.

What about Mac D's drive thru and apple pay? Surely you're not committing an offence if you are on private property?

Really ! So would that be the same advice you would have given to someone who was cautioned about crimes against minors ? And the employer has the ability to apply discretion if the information is given but if you don't submit the information and found out it will go against you more . Dbs can be required for so many jobs not just school/ medical based . What an odd reply. Why would assume that? The OP got a caution for defending himself from a bully. My advice would have been to not disclose it at all. Claim ignorance. Hope for the best as this seems to be going against him anyway. He has 3 years before its a non issue. If i understand it right, a DBS is now being carried out because he chose to disclose it?

You were cautioned, not prosecuted. Just don't voluntarily give that information up in the future. Why would you? Unless you'reworking with sensitive or valuable things i cant imagine why anyone will ask for a DBS check. Just f**king lie. In a fewyears it will be history anyway. Honesty isn't always the best policy. It isn't like it's a devastating lie. You punched an **** who needed punching.

From Wiki Per the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, simple cautions, reprimands and final warnings become spent (meaning that they do not need to be disclosed, unless applying for particular types of work) immediately, and conditional cautions become spent after 3 months.[15] Cautions will appear on a DBS certificate until 6 years have passed (or 2 years if the person was under 18 at the time of caution) provided the offence is not on the prescribed list of offences that will never be filtered from a criminal record check.[16]

Convictions can become spent after a certain period. 6 years i think. A caution isn't a conviction, though is it? I was cautioned for drunken disorderly years ago, and had to fill out a Government Security check form for access ti Government buildings and i never mentioned my caution and nothing came back about it either. :/

http://www.oldtools.co.uk/107-screwdrivers