(Must be a nutter to weigh on this one ) I'm with shorty. The message the poster's trying to say is that it's better to wear proper bike gear than to wear normal clothes. Is this true? I see it this way: imagine that you were to put 1000 or so people who'd just crashed while wearing bike kit on your left, and 1000 or so who just crashed wearing a sweatshirt and jogging bottoms on right. I reckon that most (although not all!) people would say that, while the group on the left wouldn't be a pretty sight, the group on the right would look even worse off. Another thing is likely to be true: that there'll be some people in the sweatshirt group on the right who'll be in a better state than some of those who were wearing head to toe kit on the left. Just as there'll be some people who crash in biker boots who end up worse off than if they'd worn shoes (perhaps because they were unlucky and picked a boot that was badly designed, or perhaps they were just unlucky in the crash - I don't know what happened to you, TC ). But in my view, this doesn't mean the basic common sense message of the poster is "all subjective". I'd say it just means that when it comes to what happens to you in a crash, that luck plays a part, and what you're wearing plays a part too.