Jump to content

RideWithStyles

Registered users
  • Posts

    2,928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by RideWithStyles

  1. just seems sooo random and out of sorts. like a giant just chopped off the top half of a light house, got a small wendy house nearby and dropped it on top for a bit of a laugh...
  2. monument of all the things that get thrown/end up into the sea?
  3. clear the worst off by hand, you might be able to get away using a cloth damp with paraffin but my safe suggestion would be to use electrical contact cleaner as it is pretty much safe on anything and leaves no residue so great for the wires your gonna be working on straight afterwards. any small autofactor, some fuel stations might sell it or terrible places called halfords.
  4. until someone has to fix your f**k up.
  5. Hi and welcome
  6. yes IF thats in the context of assuming its the right call/decision to make in the first place doesnt it?
  7. just
  8. yup roughly.
  9. its very white, a bit too white
  10. RideWithStyles

    hello

    i went from: inline4 600 (100hp), triple 955 (150hp) that was heavier but a bit more top heavy, 500 twin (46hp) weighs less though not as much as ud hope for but was quite well balanced with a great spread of torque from nowhere up to the red line that made it really nice on the roads to that makes a 4cyl 1000 jealous. inline4 again but a 650 (80ish hp) that by specs doesnt seem to weigh greatly more but definitely is and more topside but nowhere near as the 955 was, slower than the 500 unless you want to ride it in the 10-14k rev range all the time. i much prefer the twin and triple characters tbh. mid capacity bike will do. twins for more fun below 70, triples for allround and slightly upper speeds, and inline fours for scream if you wanna go faster or to jail is my opinion.
  11. i agree with MBF, nothing wrong with the brand, more budget friendly but might be just the price your putting them up for or just not found the right buyer yet?
  12. first though costly but long term far better is to stick to the factorys choice of options if possible or if truely aftermarket cos you cant get them anymore go with there brand options so for example triumph was leo vince but more modern arrow and most japs will be Akrops. failing that just stick with a well trusted brand.
  13. RideWithStyles

    hello

    Hello
  14. Hi and welcome! Ex Benelli Leoncino owner too. Enjoy the seasons ahead.
  15. Missi BF is correct. All depends on what the system is, has, cant or cannot do from a starting point. weither its a program or a design. each unit as a component and bike as a whole is individual. you could put 5 bikes together and RR them, each one will be slightly different in their character of power delivery, one might be slightly more power or flatter torque, might run a bit lean at the bottom of rev but ok at the top or be the other way. so if you know what type of engine character your dealing with and the effects of what the component(s) your swapping to is expected or could do. so does it allow more flow at the bottom of the rev range to fill in the hole the std system is expected or priority of the higher revs where a racer can might be more suited? so does changing it make the parameters too far ff what a ecu can do from its std factory map and create holes or errors? depends on its design. thats why if the bike seems too different after the fitting parts a custom map is a sensible thing. so if you buy it put some budget asside to factor this in.
  16. lovely birds, every right to be here! if it got rid of the cats around me then id pay for their keep!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Please Sign In or Sign Up