That's not how it works! The position of the piston in the cycle has nothing to do with the efficiency of the system. All you're proving with the calculation you keep wheeling out is the surface speed of something which is pretty much meaningless. Have you calculated the torque that would be generated in your system? Do you know what the friction would be? Can the torque overcome the friction? etc, etc... Besides which, you're trying to claim that your thing is 20 times more efficient than reciprocating engines which are generally 20% - 40% efficient. Therefore the maximum you could possibly attain is 5 times improvement. That's before heat loss, intake & exhaust losses, friction, blah, blah. That's a very impressive figure if attainable but you need to do the calculations to prove what you're saying before anyone will take you seriously.